User Tools

Site Tools


raiding-pd-with-summons

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
raiding-pd-with-summons [2022/08/06 19:04]
demonsthenes [Raiders that are not efficient] Serpent Fiend.
raiding-pd-with-summons [2022/08/07 07:15] (current)
nunda [Raiders that are not efficient] pack of wolves hoverlink
Line 73: Line 73:
   * {{gems>20B}} ({{gems>15B}} late game): 2 ??Storm Demon?? at front on Fire.   * {{gems>20B}} ({{gems>15B}} late game): 2 ??Storm Demon?? at front on Fire.
   * {{gems>33B}}: 3 ??Vampire?? units. While this consumes 3 mage turns, the vampires are [[immortal]], and thus can be used again repeatedly, making this potentially a budget option. Hold + Attack closest is preferred; the fight can go very long, as vampires get repelled a lot.    * {{gems>33B}}: 3 ??Vampire?? units. While this consumes 3 mage turns, the vampires are [[immortal]], and thus can be used again repeatedly, making this potentially a budget option. Hold + Attack closest is preferred; the fight can go very long, as vampires get repelled a lot. 
 +  * The [[Hidden In Terrain]] spells are efficient, in the sense that the ~40-50 units summoned are probably fair to value at about 1 gem each, and 7 units (say, 2 ??Unfrozen Warrior?? and 5 ??Unfrozen?? in cold 2 beats our PD challenge easily without losses. But they're an extraordinarily expensive bundle.
  
 Many undead and demons have perfect morale, and will keep fighting even after heavy casualties. However, if the army HP rout happens, any ??mindless?? undead will dissolve. Many undead and demons have perfect morale, and will keep fighting even after heavy casualties. However, if the army HP rout happens, any ??mindless?? undead will dissolve.
Line 116: Line 117:
   * {{gems>21B}}: 3 ??Devil?? can win if they snipe the commander, but can also be wiped and often taken attrition. Could be economical with ??Infernal Forces?? discount, as extra imps really help.   * {{gems>21B}}: 3 ??Devil?? can win if they snipe the commander, but can also be wiped and often taken attrition. Could be economical with ??Infernal Forces?? discount, as extra imps really help.
   * {{gems>12B}}: 12 ??Fiery Imp?? often rout to archer fire; more requires 3 mage turns.   * {{gems>12B}}: 12 ??Fiery Imp?? often rout to archer fire; more requires 3 mage turns.
-  * {{gems>8N}} 40 ??Wolf?? from ??Summon Wolves?? lose.+  * {{gems>8N}} 40 ??Wolf?? from ??Pack of Wolves?? (or ??Call of the Wild??lose.
   * {{gems>8N}} 10 ??Killer Mantis?? win with ~30% losses; 7 lose badly.   * {{gems>8N}} 10 ??Killer Mantis?? win with ~30% losses; 7 lose badly.
   * {{gems>6N}} 2 ??Amphiptere?? lose; more requires 3 mage turns.   * {{gems>6N}} 2 ??Amphiptere?? lose; more requires 3 mage turns.
   * {{gems>8N}} 10 ??Horned Serpent?? win with ~30% losses; 7 lose badly.   * {{gems>8N}} 10 ??Horned Serpent?? win with ~30% losses; 7 lose badly.
   * {{gems>10N}} 2 ??Kithaironic Lion?? lose.   * {{gems>10N}} 2 ??Kithaironic Lion?? lose.
 +  * {{gems>10N}} 25 ??Sea Dog?? might lose, or suffer >50% casualties if victorious. Requires 5 mage turns.
   * {{gems>7N}} 5 ??Bog Beast?? lose.   * {{gems>7N}} 5 ??Bog Beast?? lose.
   * {{gems>9N}} 8 ??Leogryph?? lose.   * {{gems>9N}} 8 ??Leogryph?? lose.
 +  * {{gems>8N}} 10 ??Woodland Spirit?? win with 20% losses. Also [[homesickness]] is bad for raiders.
   * {{gems>9N}} 3 ??Lumber Construct?? lose, despite requiring 3 mage turns.   * {{gems>9N}} 3 ??Lumber Construct?? lose, despite requiring 3 mage turns.
   * {{gems>6N}} 3 ??Forest Giant?? win, but require 3 mage turns. 2 lose badly.   * {{gems>6N}} 3 ??Forest Giant?? win, but require 3 mage turns. 2 lose badly.
raiding-pd-with-summons.1659812652.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/08/06 19:04 by demonsthenes