This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
remote-site-searching [2025/01/16 16:50] isitaris [Formula] |
remote-site-searching [2025/01/16 17:15] (current) isitaris |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| ====Scenario ==== | ====Scenario ==== | ||
| - | Searching with a X2 mage (no crosspaths) using a remote search spell for a given number of turns, then searching manually by walking and using the search order on a new province every other turn for another given number of turns. | + | Searching with a X2+ mage (no crosspaths) using a remote search spell for a given number of turns, then searching manually by walking and using the search order on a new province every other turn for another given number of turns. |
| + | |||
| + | I have not tried modelling mages with more than one path. | ||
| ====Variables definition==== | ====Variables definition==== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
| The expected number of gems received since starting the remote searching is: | The expected number of gems received since starting the remote searching is: | ||
| - | -C·r -------------------------------------- cost of the r remotes\\ | + | - C·r ------------------------------------- cost of the r remotes\\ |
| + r·(r+1)/ | + r·(r+1)/ | ||
| - | + (N-r)·(N-r+1)/ | + | + (N-r)·(N-r+1)/ |
| - | + 2·(N-r)·r·G ------------------------- gems found by the N-r provinces searched manually during the 2·(N-r) turns of walking search\\ | + | + 2·(N-r)·r·G |
| + (T-(r+2·(N-r))·(r·G+(N-r)·g) ----- gems found by all the provinces during the T-(x+2·(N-x) turns left after everything has been searched\\ | + (T-(r+2·(N-r))·(r·G+(N-r)·g) ----- gems found by all the provinces during the T-(x+2·(N-x) turns left after everything has been searched\\ | ||
| to be compared with N·(N+1)/ | to be compared with N·(N+1)/ | ||
| - | Here is the difference for 15 provinces and T=2x15 turns of horizon (that' | + | ====Result with an example==== |
| + | Here is the difference for 15 provinces and T=2x15 turns of horizon (that' | ||
| The optimum way of searching those 15 provinces with a single mage if you look at your gem income in 30 turns (ie when the mage has finished walking in the no remote scenario) seems to be 5-8 casts of remotes (less than a gem of difference). (assuming no error in the modeling) | The optimum way of searching those 15 provinces with a single mage if you look at your gem income in 30 turns (ie when the mage has finished walking in the no remote scenario) seems to be 5-8 casts of remotes (less than a gem of difference). (assuming no error in the modeling) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Contact: Isitaris on most dominion' | ||