This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
remote-site-searching [2025/01/16 16:53] isitaris [Result] |
remote-site-searching [2025/01/16 17:15] (current) isitaris |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
====Scenario ==== | ====Scenario ==== | ||
- | Searching with a X2 mage (no crosspaths) using a remote search spell for a given number of turns, then searching manually by walking and using the search order on a new province every other turn for another given number of turns. | + | Searching with a X2+ mage (no crosspaths) using a remote search spell for a given number of turns, then searching manually by walking and using the search order on a new province every other turn for another given number of turns. |
+ | |||
+ | I have not tried modelling mages with more than one path. | ||
====Variables definition==== | ====Variables definition==== | ||
Line 23: | Line 25: | ||
to be compared with N·(N+1)/ | to be compared with N·(N+1)/ | ||
- | ====Result==== | + | ====Result |
- | Here is the difference for 15 provinces and T=2x15 turns of horizon (that' | + | Here is the difference for 15 provinces and T=2x15 turns of horizon (that' |
The optimum way of searching those 15 provinces with a single mage if you look at your gem income in 30 turns (ie when the mage has finished walking in the no remote scenario) seems to be 5-8 casts of remotes (less than a gem of difference). (assuming no error in the modeling) | The optimum way of searching those 15 provinces with a single mage if you look at your gem income in 30 turns (ie when the mage has finished walking in the no remote scenario) seems to be 5-8 casts of remotes (less than a gem of difference). (assuming no error in the modeling) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Contact: Isitaris on most dominion' |