User Tools

Site Tools


talk:nation-format

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
talk:nation-format [2020/01/29 20:41]
mergele
talk:nation-format [2020/01/29 23:23] (current)
causk added confusion
Line 1: Line 1:
-I personally think the Ulm style does look really good, but considering the standpoint of having to make one I'd advocate for standardising on the Lanka-style --mergele+I personally think the Ulm style does look really good, but considering the standpoint of having to make one I'd advocate for standardising on the Lanka-style. I'd suggest the inclusion of a "notable spells" area for spells which will be used a lot and spells that are usually rare and might be forgotten but can be comfortably reached and used effectivelyby this nation. --mergele 
 + 
 +Created a temple from Ulm with some extra headers and suggestions what should go there. Personally i think we need some other way to do tables, i cant see many people trying to make that work and look decent.  
 +Also continuing question, what the scope and intention of the nation pages should be: info dump? mod inspector but more up to date? guides on strategy on how to play and whats good? (prone to run into debates/disagreements) --causk
talk/nation-format.1580330470.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/01/29 20:41 by mergele