This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
user:loggy:gemusage [2021/09/04 01:01] loggy |
user:loggy:gemusage [2021/09/04 01:05] loggy |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* Add this value to the total number of hostile gems. | * Add this value to the total number of hostile gems. | ||
* If total nonholy paths (as calculated above) is 4+ and the number of gems > 0: | * If total nonholy paths (as calculated above) is 4+ and the number of gems > 0: | ||
- | * If (a random number | + | * If (a random number |
* If has retreat is 0: | * If has retreat is 0: | ||
* Look up the number of items carried by the commander, add it to the total number of hostile items | * Look up the number of items carried by the commander, add it to the total number of hostile items | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
* There is any number of gems (so long as it isn't 0) and a total of 10+ non-holy paths across all hostile commanders | * There is any number of gems (so long as it isn't 0) and a total of 10+ non-holy paths across all hostile commanders | ||
* Total numbers of hostile gems + (items * 3) + non-holy paths is 16+ | * Total numbers of hostile gems + (items * 3) + non-holy paths is 16+ | ||
- | * Any single mage, providing it has some gems and 4+ non-holy paths, has a ((paths + gems - 3)*25)% chance to trigger gem usage | + | * Any single mage, providing it has some gems and 4+ non-holy paths, has a ((paths + gems - 2)*33)% chance to trigger gem usage |
* Any single commander has an ((number of carried items - 3)*50)% chance to trigger gem usage | * Any single commander has an ((number of carried items - 3)*50)% chance to trigger gem usage |