This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
user:loggy:gemusage [2021/09/04 01:05] loggy |
user:loggy:gemusage [2022/03/05 22:31] loggy past me couldn't add up |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
* There is any number of gems (so long as it isn't 0) and a total of 10+ non-holy paths across all hostile commanders | * There is any number of gems (so long as it isn't 0) and a total of 10+ non-holy paths across all hostile commanders | ||
* Total numbers of hostile gems + (items * 3) + non-holy paths is 16+ | * Total numbers of hostile gems + (items * 3) + non-holy paths is 16+ | ||
- | * Any single mage, providing it has some gems and 4+ non-holy paths, has a ((paths + gems - 2)*33)% chance to trigger gem usage | + | * Any single mage, providing it has some gems and 4+ non-holy paths, has a ((paths + gems - 4)*33)% chance to trigger gem usage |
* Any single commander has an ((number of carried items - 3)*50)% chance to trigger gem usage | * Any single commander has an ((number of carried items - 3)*50)% chance to trigger gem usage |